Big Oil and the coming bailout

 

Exxon et al. are on track for a bailout that will make the financial rescue of ‘08 look like handing a lollypop to a child.

Oil companies – no matter what you think of them – create an essential product for modern society.
Covid has caused a temporary surplus of crude which in turn has brought down prices significantly.
US producers have been leaning heavily on horizontal / fracking to extract oil. This method of extracting oil is considerably more expensive than traditional drilling.  The reason why oil companies are going that more expensive route is because there are fewer and fewer vertical drilling locations available that economically make sense -we are running out of the affordable oil that society is built on.

The result of companies switching to more expensive production is that – for example – the free cashflow from Exxon has dropped from 30-40bn/year in the mid 2000’s to 5-10bn with more and more quarters showing negative cashflow.

XOM is borrowing money to pay dividends. In an indirect way – borrowing money and then giving it to shareholders reduces the net equity in a company - management is choosing to return investors their own capital in a tax inefficient manner to keep up appearances.
If these trends continue – increasing cost of production with flattish revenue -  the oil industry may very well found itself in a position where costs consistently exceed revenue which would put the oil industry effectively out of business.
Given that they produce a commodity that is essential to society there would be no alternative than a massive and ongoing bailout. The difference between the banking system bailout in '08 and this one is that will have to be ongoing until we can wean ourselves of their product - and that will be a while simply because of the massive scale.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Examining the Crypt in Crypto

[This is a recap of a more expansive discussion of our monetary system including bitcoin. When the larger version is complete it will be posted here] Crypto currency appears to be a new development and a step beyond traditional banking as we know it. However, when you take a closer look it will be clear that this is not the case. In fact, crypto currency is in a way a full circle back to the day of gold and silver coins. In the olden days, coins were the medium of exchange, and a store of value as well as a unit of account.   As the global population and economic activity grew shortages and practical issues ensued.   As a result physical precious metals were replaced initially by receipts from the safekeepers, then by currency. Initially that currency was 100% backed by p recious m etals (“PM”s) then, over time less and less. The reason for this is not necessarily nefarious. If the quantity of currency is determined by the quantity of p recious m etals, the amount of gold/silver
Read more

Currency, Carry and Entropy

  Currency, Carry and Entropy Things ain’t what they used to be or How currencies are not stores of value   One of the standard attributes that money is claimed to have is that it acts as a store of value. “Store of value” tells you that it is the current holder’s intent to keep the currency for a while before exchanging it and that during that time before the exchange, the currency is expected to hold its purchasing power. Money, however, has a “particular requirement “that is the proverbial fly in the ointment. That characteristic has interesting and not so often mentioned consequences on how to view the “store of value “attribute of money. Gold bugs like to mention how gold has maintained its value over time and how that value has never gone to zero or completely disappeared, like many fiat currencies have done. This may be true, but it is a grossly incomplete statement of affairs. What is always missing in that observation is the storage cost, the negative carry, that c
Read more

Getting Lucky with Trump

  The US, as a country, should count its blessings that Trump was the president over the last   almost 4 years. As crude and rough as Trump may be, the US has been incredibly lucky. His narcissistic nature, as painful it may be to witness and deal with the consequences of decisions made by him, are exactly that – all about him. Fealty to him is required; Kim Jong-Un fell in love with him and his stable genius. He seems to have an infinite need for praise and admiration. While revolting (yet slightly interesting from a psychological point of view) this is actually a great thing. Trump’s infinite need to be loved and adored, combined with the need to embarrass anyone and anything that was not sufficiently obedient and full of praise, is what has prevented the US from bidding farewell to the American Experiment. Trump needs to be the best, and to have the biggest crowds. It got so bad that even Fox (yes, Fox) called him out on it.  During the 2016 presidential campaign, his need to
Read more